Thanks for your comment. Actually I didn’t take the event so seriously. But I am sorry about that if I did offense you in any way. I can totally understand if you don’t want to vote in this list.

Thanks for your comment. Actually I didn’t take the event so seriously. But I am sorry about that if I did offense you in any way. I can totally understand if you don’t want to vote in this list.

I went to that article. And I, as a fan of 魚夫, know at least half of these people, REAL PEOPLE. In fact, I recommended 魚夫’s work once for a while, even though I seldom logon to Hemidemi. (I just rss two groups and use google reader to read.)

The problem, as it was mentioned in the other article at this web site, is that the mechanism does NOT work. People who read articles are so diverse and LAZY to recommend good articles. A group of people chatting together can easily create ‘top’ articles. (And I personally never bother to go to the web site to read any top article, even though my articles went to top once for a while).

I believe there are something more interesting and will have more impact in the future.

The blog of 玉山 by 魚夫 did two things recently: 1. Digging up the ‘suffering’ people in a KMT advertisement to show that they are, indeed, KMT elite. 2. That 玉山 gang recorded news from the web in which Ma said “I treat you as human, … , I will educate you” to the Aboriginal people while the Aboriginal TV　Station took it off from the web. These two pieces of work, I believe, will have more impact in the future than any of the events listed above. (And of course, they may be too political for MMDays to deal with.)

And I, as pessimistic as I can be, never believe in *any* voting system on the web and will not vote any in your list. Sorry.

I went to that article. And I, as a fan of 魚夫, know at least half of these people, REAL PEOPLE. In fact, I recommended 魚夫’s work once for a while, even though I seldom logon to Hemidemi. (I just rss two groups and use google reader to read.)

The problem, as it was mentioned in the other article at this web site, is that the mechanism does NOT work. People who read articles are so diverse and LAZY to recommend good articles. A group of people chatting together can easily create ‘top’ articles. (And I personally never bother to go to the web site to read any top article, even though my articles went to top once for a while).

I believe there are something more interesting and will have more impact in the future.

The blog of 玉山 by 魚夫 did two things recently: 1. Digging up the ‘suffering’ people in a KMT advertisement to show that they are, indeed, KMT elite. 2. That 玉山 gang recorded news from the web in which Ma said “I treat you as human, … , I will educate you” to the Aboriginal people while the Aboriginal TV　Station took it off from the web. These two pieces of work, I believe, will have more impact in the future than any of the events listed above. (And of course, they may be too political for MMDays to deal with.)

And I, as pessimistic as I can be, never believe in *any* voting system on the web and will not vote any in your list. Sorry.

我個人覺得那些帳號真的很詭異，包括人數，姓名，參與情況。就算是自願的，我想當中應該還是有包括人頭帳戶。。。。誰說貼了「我想幫點忙」，裡面的帳號就沒有人頭戶？而且申請了以後都沒在用的帳戶，為什麼不能算人頭戶？

不過既然有待商榷的空間，我把選項改成「大動員」，不用分身這個字眼了，謝謝您的指教:)

朱學恒vs魚夫原文出處
http://blogs.myoops.org/lucifer.php/2007/12/16/welovefish

我個人覺得那些帳號真的很詭異，包括人數，姓名，參與情況。就算是自願的，我想當中應該還是有包括人頭帳戶。。。。誰說貼了「我想幫點忙」，裡面的帳號就沒有人頭戶？而且申請了以後都沒在用的帳戶，為什麼不能算人頭戶？

不過既然有待商榷的空間，我把選項改成「大動員」，不用分身這個字眼了，謝謝您的指教:)

朱學恒vs魚夫原文出處
http://blogs.myoops.org/lucifer.php/2007/12/16/welovefish

He has a gang of fans who actively and enthusiastically push his articles up in the ratings.

Please pay more attention in verifying the “news”.

He has a gang of fans who actively and enthusiastically push his articles up in the ratings.

Please pay more attention in verifying the “news”.