<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: [好書介紹]人月神話 The Mythical Man-Month</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mmdays.com/2007/07/11/the_mythical_man-month/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mmdays.com/2007/07/11/the_mythical_man-month/</link>
	<description>網路, 產業, 資訊, 觀察, 生活, 電影, 技術, 新知, 科技, 媒體, 趨勢, Web 2.0</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://mmdays.com/2007/07/11/the_mythical_man-month/#comment-12035</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 07:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmdays.com/2007/07/11/the_mythical_man-month/#comment-12035</guid>
		<description>我不能同意xoidiot更多了啊~~
尤其是狂趕release跟patch的時候,
什麼人月? 那可以吃嗎?
即便有主管讀過, 也只是當小說啊...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>我不能同意xoidiot更多了啊~~<br />
尤其是狂趕release跟patch的時候,<br />
什麼人月? 那可以吃嗎?<br />
即便有主管讀過, 也只是當小說啊&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iguest</title>
		<link>http://mmdays.com/2007/07/11/the_mythical_man-month/#comment-12038</link>
		<dc:creator>iguest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmdays.com/2007/07/11/the_mythical_man-month/#comment-12038</guid>
		<description>這個部分很普通，這問題本應是很顯而易見的，卻為難作者花了不少篇幅告訴讀者人力與時間無法對等互換。知道了，一看即明；不知道，便要花費極大的力氣說明，別人還不一定懂，這就是人月無法對等互換的原因之一了。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>這個部分很普通，這問題本應是很顯而易見的，卻為難作者花了不少篇幅告訴讀者人力與時間無法對等互換。知道了，一看即明；不知道，便要花費極大的力氣說明，別人還不一定懂，這就是人月無法對等互換的原因之一了。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 人月神話 The Mythical Man-Month at enchao.com</title>
		<link>http://mmdays.com/2007/07/11/the_mythical_man-month/#comment-12040</link>
		<dc:creator>人月神話 The Mythical Man-Month at enchao.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmdays.com/2007/07/11/the_mythical_man-month/#comment-12040</guid>
		<description>[...] http://mmdays.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/the_mythical_man-month/ 看完這篇文章 想到在台灣從事設計工作者的悲哀 試想看如果要評比音樂家,畫家也用一樣的邏輯 每個月歌寫的多,畫的多就是績效好,就是好的藝術家 軟體工程師績效用程式碼行數來算好了 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://mmdays.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/the_mythical_man-month/" rel="nofollow">http://mmdays.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/the_mythical_man-month/</a> 看完這篇文章 想到在台灣從事設計工作者的悲哀 試想看如果要評比音樂家,畫家也用一樣的邏輯 每個月歌寫的多,畫的多就是績效好,就是好的藝術家 軟體工程師績效用程式碼行數來算好了 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Sunday</title>
		<link>http://mmdays.com/2007/07/11/the_mythical_man-month/#comment-12033</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Sunday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 04:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmdays.com/2007/07/11/the_mythical_man-month/#comment-12033</guid>
		<description>Dear 昆蟲
    Thanks for your precious information.

Dear Kevin
    Thanks for your correction. That should be "No Silver Bullet"

Dear xoidiot
    Thanks for your feedbacks

Dear Maoke Jackson
    Sorry for the wrong figures. I have fixed it. ^^


Mr.Sunday</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear 昆蟲<br />
    Thanks for your precious information.</p>
<p>Dear Kevin<br />
    Thanks for your correction. That should be &#8220;No Silver Bullet&#8221;</p>
<p>Dear xoidiot<br />
    Thanks for your feedbacks</p>
<p>Dear Maoke Jackson<br />
    Sorry for the wrong figures. I have fixed it. ^^</p>
<p>Mr.Sunday</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maoke Jackson</title>
		<link>http://mmdays.com/2007/07/11/the_mythical_man-month/#comment-12034</link>
		<dc:creator>Maoke Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 03:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmdays.com/2007/07/11/the_mythical_man-month/#comment-12034</guid>
		<description>圖表上的人月標示是否對調了？
我解讀起來總覺得不順利。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>圖表上的人月標示是否對調了？<br />
我解讀起來總覺得不順利。</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xoidiot</title>
		<link>http://mmdays.com/2007/07/11/the_mythical_man-month/#comment-12039</link>
		<dc:creator>xoidiot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 00:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmdays.com/2007/07/11/the_mythical_man-month/#comment-12039</guid>
		<description>^_^
2004年的時候我就拖了幾個朋友一起買來看... 對於當時還在軟體業的我, 感觸很深. 但是現在已經是2007年了, 我也已經離開了前一家公司...

老實說, 這個東西對於有點急功近利的主管來講, 是一點用都沒有的. 對他們來講, 人月可以隨便的加減乘除(打折來算喔), 帳面上永遠都只有開發程式的時程, 上班永遠都是打卡制, 下班永遠都是責任制....

但是我還是相信, 總會有個地方有個公司有個主管, 會相信這本書的.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^_^<br />
2004年的時候我就拖了幾個朋友一起買來看&#8230; 對於當時還在軟體業的我, 感觸很深. 但是現在已經是2007年了, 我也已經離開了前一家公司&#8230;</p>
<p>老實說, 這個東西對於有點急功近利的主管來講, 是一點用都沒有的. 對他們來講, 人月可以隨便的加減乘除(打折來算喔), 帳面上永遠都只有開發程式的時程, 上班永遠都是打卡制, 下班永遠都是責任制&#8230;.</p>
<p>但是我還是相信, 總會有個地方有個公司有個主管, 會相信這本書的.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://mmdays.com/2007/07/11/the_mythical_man-month/#comment-12037</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 23:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmdays.com/2007/07/11/the_mythical_man-month/#comment-12037</guid>
		<description>現實生活應該很多ㄑ字型的工作效率吧？人少的時候花很多月，人多的時候就手忙腳亂幫倒忙，人數剛好才是最高效率。

最後是不是Typo? "No silver bullet" 還是 "So silver bullet"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>現實生活應該很多ㄑ字型的工作效率吧？人少的時候花很多月，人多的時候就手忙腳亂幫倒忙，人數剛好才是最高效率。</p>
<p>最後是不是Typo? &#8220;No silver bullet&#8221; 還是 &#8220;So silver bullet&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 昆蟲</title>
		<link>http://mmdays.com/2007/07/11/the_mythical_man-month/#comment-12036</link>
		<dc:creator>昆蟲</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 23:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmdays.com/2007/07/11/the_mythical_man-month/#comment-12036</guid>
		<description>FYI:

   The book emphasizes the idea of "no silver bullet" (no simple/straightforward solution) again and again.

Fred also said that the best software engineering model is the "surgeon model".  However, people's egos make it very difficult to implement.

   BTW, Fred is the legendary IBM 360/370 creator.  Before his work, programs have to be rewritten for every new hardware.  (You can imagine how old he is, right?)

   And, he built the first (or, one of the first) computer science department in USA from scratch.

   Fred also said that "computer science" is not science.  He regretted that he used that name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI:</p>
<p>   The book emphasizes the idea of &#8220;no silver bullet&#8221; (no simple/straightforward solution) again and again.</p>
<p>Fred also said that the best software engineering model is the &#8220;surgeon model&#8221;.  However, people&#8217;s egos make it very difficult to implement.</p>
<p>   BTW, Fred is the legendary IBM 360/370 creator.  Before his work, programs have to be rewritten for every new hardware.  (You can imagine how old he is, right?)</p>
<p>   And, he built the first (or, one of the first) computer science department in USA from scratch.</p>
<p>   Fred also said that &#8220;computer science&#8221; is not science.  He regretted that he used that name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
